zlacker

[return to "2025: The Year in LLMs"]
1. didip+Th[view] [source] 2026-01-01 02:38:52
>>simonw+(OP)
Indeed. I don't understand why Hacker News is so dismissive about the coming of LLMs, maybe HN readers are going through 5 stages of grief?

But LLM is certainly a game changer, I can see it delivering impact bigger than the internet itself. Both require a lot of investments.

◧◩
2. Night_+Nn[view] [source] 2026-01-01 03:46:03
>>didip+Th
LLMs hold some real utility. But that real utility is buried under a mountain of fake hype and over-promises to keep shareholder value high.

LLMs have real limitations that aren't going away any time soon - not until we move to a new technology fundamentally different and separate from them - sharing almost nothing in common. There's a lot of 'progress-washing' going on where people claim that these shortfalls will magically disappear if we throw enough data and compute at it when they clearly will not.

◧◩◪
3. Gigach+Vn[view] [source] 2026-01-01 03:47:52
>>Night_+Nn
Pretty much. What actually exists is very impressive. But what was promised and marketed has not been delivered.
◧◩◪◨
4. rustys+ap[view] [source] 2026-01-01 04:05:50
>>Gigach+Vn
Markets never deliver. That isnt new, i do think llms are not far off from google in terms of impact.

Search, as of today, is inferior to frontier models as a product. However, best case still misses expected returns by miles which is where the growsing comes from.

Generative art/ai is still up in the air for staying power but id predict it isnt going away.

[go to top]