zlacker

[return to "2025: The Year in LLMs"]
1. websit+nc[view] [source] 2026-01-01 01:40:42
>>simonw+(OP)
I'm curious how all of the progress will be seen if it does indeed result in mass unemployment (but not eradication) of professional software engineers.
◧◩
2. ori_b+Pd[view] [source] 2026-01-01 01:55:10
>>websit+nc
My prediction: If we can successfully get rid of most software engineers, we can get rid of most knowledge work. Given the state of robotics, manual labor is likely to outlive intellectual labor.
◧◩◪
3. BobbyJ+ao[view] [source] 2026-01-01 03:51:40
>>ori_b+Pd
I would have agreed with this a few months ago, but something Ive learned is that the ability to verify an LLMs output is paramount to its value. In software, you can review its output, add tests, on top of other adversarial techniques to verify the output immediately after generation.

With most other knowledge work, I don't think that is the case. Maybe actuarial or accounting work, but most knowledge work exists at a cross section of function and taste, and the latter isn't an automatically verifiable output.

[go to top]