zlacker

[return to "Inside CECOT – 60 Minutes [video]"]
1. pavel_+Y2[view] [source] 2025-12-23 01:01:40
>>lawles+(OP)
There are other links here as well: https://www.404media.co/archivists-posted-the-60-minutes-cec...
◧◩
2. tastyf+W3[view] [source] 2025-12-23 01:09:57
>>pavel_+Y2
404media is shadowbanned from HN for nebulous reasons. The mods should really revisit this policy: they've been doing some great reporting recently.
◧◩◪
3. defros+la[view] [source] 2025-12-23 02:15:56
>>tastyf+W3
A16z-backed Doublespeed hacked, revealing what its AI-generated accounts promote (404media.co)

  289 points by grahamlee 5 days ago | flag | past | 171 comments
so some slip through.

But: https://news.ycombinator.com/from?site=404media.co sure has a lot of [dead]

◧◩◪◨
4. UncleM+Jd[view] [source] 2025-12-23 02:48:50
>>defros+la
Don't forget that the mods tried to remove the reference to a16z from the title on that one.
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. tomhow+Zd1[view] [source] 2025-12-23 14:52:51
>>UncleM+Jd
I tried to make the title fit the guidelines and the character limit, then changed it when the community explained why it was important for A16Z to be in the title.

Why do people think we're motivated to “suppress” negative stories about A16Z? They've been criticized forever here and we've never had a problem with it. All we care about is whether a topic makes for an interesting discussion on HN.

https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que...

https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que...

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. Teever+Ug1[view] [source] 2025-12-23 15:12:50
>>tomhow+Zd1
> Why do people think we're motivated to “suppress” negative stories about A16Z?

I think a more charitable interpretation of this kind of argument is that the money and power that entities like A16Z have make the possibility of corruption of endeavours like HN trivial.

In light of the ease in which a wealthy entity like A16Z can exert influence over an entity like HN and the track records of various A16Z adjacent/similar people doing similar things to other HN-like entities it's very natural that people are concerned about the possibility of similar things happening here.

Like it or not as an editor at HN you're in a position of power and influence and others with far greater power would certainly leverage what you have here if suited their interests.

Avoiding even the appearance of impropriety is no easy task especially in this medium and I don't envy you in taking it on, but it's an essential part of something like HN. If the users in aggregate don't trust the moderation process or the administrators then this all sort of falls apart and the interesting discussion suffers.

[go to top]