zlacker

[return to "US destroying its reputation as a scientific leader – European science diplomat"]
1. zkmon+V3[view] [source] 2025-12-22 19:49:09
>>xqcgre+(OP)
It sounds more like a parroting of a popular sentiment as a conclusion, rather than providing a data-based assessment. What are the numbers? What's the real impact? How much lead does USA have over it's nearest competition?
◧◩
2. afavou+h4[view] [source] 2025-12-22 19:51:02
>>zkmon+V3
The U.S. Is Funding Fewer Grants in Every Area of Science and Medicine

https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2025/12/02/upshot/trump-...

Far too early to know the exact long term effects but it’s definitely happening.

◧◩◪
3. heiron+2a[view] [source] 2025-12-22 20:18:59
>>afavou+h4
Is there any metric saying what the proper amount is or is it always “more”? Is there a point where others should do more and the US less?
◧◩◪◨
4. afavou+2k[view] [source] 2025-12-22 21:10:47
>>heiron+2a
> With an annual budget of more than $47 billion, NIH is the largest single public funder of biomedical and behavioral research in the world. In fiscal year 2023, NIH funding generated an estimated $92.89 billion in economic activity.

https://www.nih.gov/about-nih/impact-nih-research/serving-so...

The US isn’t doing the world a favor by funding this stuff. The country directly benefits from it.

[go to top]