zlacker

>>donoho+(OP)
There are quite a few comments below complaining about the headline - happy to change it, but I'm in a meeting trying to figure out more about >>46301921 for the next bit.

Can someone suggest a better title? Better here means "accurate and neutral, and preferably using representative language from the article".

>>dang+6o1
"Independent review of UK national security law warns of overreach" - this, apart from the addition of "UK", is verbatim from the article and much more accurately describes the event being reported.

>>omnico+Lx1
Ok, let's use that. Thanks!

This, btw, is exactly what we look for when doing a title replacement:

> verbatim from the article and much better describes the event being reported

That's what I usually call "representative language from the article" (https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que...). The idea is not to invent new wordings, but rather to find the place where the article 'confesses' what it is really about.