zlacker

[return to "Independent review of UK national security law warns of overreach"]
1. dang+6o1[view] [source] 2025-12-18 18:38:35
>>donoho+(OP)
There are quite a few comments below complaining about the headline - happy to change it, but I'm in a meeting trying to figure out more about >>46301921 for the next bit.

Can someone suggest a better title? Better here means "accurate and neutral, and preferably using representative language from the article".

◧◩
2. omnico+Lx1[view] [source] 2025-12-18 19:25:01
>>dang+6o1
"Independent review of UK national security law warns of overreach" - this, apart from the addition of "UK", is verbatim from the article and much more accurately describes the event being reported.
[go to top]