zlacker

[return to "Independent review of UK national security law warns of overreach"]
1. omnico+97[view] [source] 2025-12-18 12:21:29
>>donoho+(OP)
This is a terrible headline, despite being the original.

The "watchdog" is a KC (senior barrister) officially appointed to review the legislation. He's warning that this could be considered hostile activity under the act, which would be a bad thing. In other words, he's criticising the act for being overly broad, a view that most on HN agree with, and his criticisms of it presumably carry some weight, given his official role.

As usual, this has provoked a load of ill-informed knee-jerk rants about the UK government from people who didn't read past the headline. This act is an absolute stinker, but let's maybe criticise what's actually happening rather than some imagined cartoon variant of it.

◧◩
2. owisd+3v[view] [source] 2025-12-18 14:50:16
>>omnico+97
Seems very coordinated, like whenever there’s an article on the Trump administration crushing free speech by cutting funding/sanctioning/suing anyone critical of it, it quickly gets flagged into oblivion, but anything the UK and others do gets spun out of proportion and hangs around on the front page for ages.
[go to top]