zlacker

>>theamk+(OP)
Ring! Please stop Ring cameras.... Ugh!!!

>>a45646+T11
It kind of upsets me that while _I_ will never install one, my bloody neighbours have and it tracks me every time I walk my dog. Gross. Honestly makes me want to vandalise them (though I will not).

>>girvo+M21
> Honestly makes me want to vandalise them (though I will not).

Sounds like the cameras are working? Seems like a reason to put up more cameras: vandals can't take out any two as easily/simultaneously.

>>15155+BB1
No, I could vandalise them easy enough, I don't because I'm not a criminal who wants to damage my neighbours things, not because it's a camera.

>>girvo+M62
Of course you could vandalize them easily enough... and be seen doing so from multiple angles: ideally leading to your prosecution and imprisonment or possibly direct kinetic response from their owners.

The legal system tends to react even more negatively to those directly attempting to undermine enforcement efforts - such as vandalizing cameras. You're not just doing "bad," you're constructively preventing evidence of your misdeeds from being gathered.

>>15155+Le2
You know, I think you may be onto something.

Perhaps we all should just live in a massive prison. The cameras should be on us 24/7. Society is nothing without hard rules, by just rulers. Ideally, kinetic enforcement applied for any misdeeds, large or small.

>>mlsu+bi2
My right to place cameras on my private property absolutely trumps your desire to not be seen or recorded (or whatever your specific grievance is) in the United States.

This isn't about "hard rules" - make laws prohibiting government use of privately-obtained data if you like - but vandalizing or prohibiting a privately-owned Ring camera is absolutely a matter of my rights being abridged.

Privacy must be created - and is quite expensive.