zlacker

>>jnord+(OP)
Earlier this year I thought that rare proprietary knowledge and IP was a safe haven from AI, since LLMs can only scrub public data.

Then it dawned on me how many companies are deeply integrating Copilot into their everyday workflows. It's the perfect Trojan Horse.

>>Oarch+65
Using an LLM on data does not ingest that data into the training corpus. LLMs don’t “learn” from the information they operate on, contrary to what a lot of people assume.

None of the mainstream paid services ingest operating data into their training sets. You will find a lot of conspiracy theories claiming that companies are saying one thing but secretly stealing your data, of course.

>>Aurorn+S5
> LLMs don’t “learn” from the information they operate on, contrary to what a lot of people assume.

Nothing is really preventing this though. AI companies have already proven they will ignore copyright and any other legal nuisance so they can train models.

>>lepton+c6
> Nothing is really preventing this though

The enterprise user agreement is preventing this.

Suggesting that AI companies will uniquely ignore the law or contracts is conspiracy theory thinking.

>>Aurorn+ag
It already happened.

"Meta Secretly Trained Its AI on a Notorious Piracy Database, Newly Unredacted Court Docs Reveal"

https://www.wired.com/story/new-documents-unredacted-meta-co...

They even admitted to using copyrighted material.

"‘Impossible’ to create AI tools like ChatGPT without copyrighted material, OpenAI says"

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2024/jan/08/ai-tools-...