zlacker

>>knacke+(OP)
If you aren't using LLMs for your reverse engineering tasks, you're missing out, big time. Claude kicks ass.

It's good at cleaning up decompiled code, at figuring out what functions do, at uncovering weird assembly tricks and more.

>>ACCoun+eao
Makes sense because LLMs are quite good at translating between natural languages.

Anyway, we're reaching the point where documentation can be generated by LLMs and this is great news for developers.

>>ameliu+sfo
Documentation is one place where humans should have input. If an LLM can generate documentation, why would I want you to generate it when I can do so myself (probably with a better, newer model)?

>>saagar+2po
Because it takes time and effort to write documentation.

If people __can__ actually read undocumented code with the help of LLMs, why do you need human-written documentation really?

>>ameliu+SDo
It doesn't need to be written by a human only, but I think generating it once and distributing it with source code is more efficient. Developers can correct errors in the generated documentation, which then can be used by humans and LLMs.