zlacker

[return to "The unexpected effectiveness of one-shot decompilation with Claude"]
1. ACCoun+eao[view] [source] 2025-12-06 13:55:23
>>knacke+(OP)
If you aren't using LLMs for your reverse engineering tasks, you're missing out, big time. Claude kicks ass.

It's good at cleaning up decompiled code, at figuring out what functions do, at uncovering weird assembly tricks and more.

◧◩
2. ameliu+sfo[view] [source] 2025-12-06 14:43:29
>>ACCoun+eao
Makes sense because LLMs are quite good at translating between natural languages.

Anyway, we're reaching the point where documentation can be generated by LLMs and this is great news for developers.

◧◩◪
3. saagar+2po[view] [source] 2025-12-06 15:59:44
>>ameliu+sfo
Documentation is one place where humans should have input. If an LLM can generate documentation, why would I want you to generate it when I can do so myself (probably with a better, newer model)?
◧◩◪◨
4. ameliu+SDo[view] [source] 2025-12-06 17:58:28
>>saagar+2po
Because it takes time and effort to write documentation.

If people __can__ actually read undocumented code with the help of LLMs, why do you need human-written documentation really?

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. baq+s1p[view] [source] 2025-12-06 21:20:59
>>ameliu+SDo
Docs are a form of error correcting coding for code. Docs+code allows you to spot discrepancies and ask which one is the intended behavior.
[go to top]