zlacker

>>altilu+(OP)
Yeah I’m definitely not going to pay a subscription for a dashcam so that some company can profit off my data. This does however sound like it could be amazing if it benefited OSM instead. One of my biggest gripes with retail dashcams is that the hardware and software feels pretty universally cheap. I’d pay a premium for a good dashcam and I’d be totally ok with my data being used to improve OSM.

>>bikela+8Mk

  > Yeah I’m definitely not going to pay a subscription for a dashcam so that some company can profit off my data.

I'm playing Devil's Advocate here, but suppose this:

A dashcam is continuously recording and collecting image data. You're not "doing" anything with that data, it's just there being recycled or thrown away.

So the argument is, essentially: "Fuck you, I'd rather nobody in the world benefit than someone make a penny off of it."

>>gavinr+SNk
Why shouldn't I get my cut, then? Why do they get to double dip? The point of the dash cam is that the data is ephemeral unless it's actually needed because something exceptional happened.

>>trasht+tOk

  > Why shouldn't I get my cut, then?

They do offer to pay you for it, which you'd know if you read the article.

>>gavinr+tRk
So you pay $20/month to be able to earn some crypto-coins they generate out of thin air to be used for...

If they aren't paying the equivalent of whatever the government allows you to deduct for 'wear and tear' on your vehicle then you're basically just subsidizing their data collection.

I don't even have an opinion on this, you do you.

--edit--

Oh, I saw down thread they're primarily a fleet services company and that explains a bunch. $20/month per car probably makes sense if you're outfitting an entire fleet and integrate it with your wonky in-house drivers' app which is barely fit for purpose. Yeah, I'm not bitter...