zlacker

>>hliyan+(OP)
We really need some legislation that outlaws this sort of control over devices we buy.

If someone wants to install an advert app on their fridge (I assume in exchange for money) then fair enough.

If I buy a tv I shouldn't just have to accept that, now or in the future, the manufacturer will sell advertising on it.

>>jamesb+X2
I'm going to keep this sort of on topic and this will not be a popular opinion.

No, this does not need legislation. If you don't wants ads on your refrigerator, how about not buying a refrigerator with a screen built in, it's not necessary.

>>mlrtim+Ih
Try to buy a new TV without « smart » features. It’s nearly impossible and all of them will come with some kind of ads on it. I fear it will become impossible to buy a fridge without screen and ad if we don’t find a way to stop this. It’s pure profit for manufacturers and the consumers are fucked since fridge are basic necessities.

>>Arcanu+3j
That would be a waste of money on the manufacturers part. It will always be possible to disable the screen

>>gentoo+1l
No for everybody it won't. Not to even mention the waste.

>>Levitz+8v
No one can force you to watch ads, they're your eyeballs. There will always be a solution to this problem; if it's in your domicile then no one can stop you from spending time coming up with solutions

>>gentoo+Cx
“Ma’am we’re not going to do anything about that flasher. No one can force you to look at him, they're your eyeballs.”

>>s0sa+By
"Officer, take that ugly man away, we don't want to have to look at him"

>>gentoo+4A
Don’t confuse things we can change with things we can’t.

>>s0sa+v21
People are born naked, there's nothing inherently wrong with being naked unless there's something inherently wrong with being a person.