zlacker

[return to "The unexpected effectiveness of one-shot decompilation with Claude"]
1. ACCoun+eao[view] [source] 2025-12-06 13:55:23
>>knacke+(OP)
If you aren't using LLMs for your reverse engineering tasks, you're missing out, big time. Claude kicks ass.

It's good at cleaning up decompiled code, at figuring out what functions do, at uncovering weird assembly tricks and more.

◧◩
2. ameliu+sfo[view] [source] 2025-12-06 14:43:29
>>ACCoun+eao
Makes sense because LLMs are quite good at translating between natural languages.

Anyway, we're reaching the point where documentation can be generated by LLMs and this is great news for developers.

◧◩◪
3. monsie+zio[view] [source] 2025-12-06 15:11:49
>>ameliu+sfo
Maybe documentation meant for other llms to ingest. Their documentation is like their code, it might work, but I don't want to have to be the one to read it.

Although of course if you don't vibe document but instead just use them as a tool, with significant human input, then yes go ahead.

[go to top]