zlacker

>>meetpa+(OP)
I feel like when I was growing up, I learned about how monopolization was bad for society when it came to industries like steel and rail. but for some reason in the 21st century we've decided that maybe corporations are somehow... better citizens or something? despite the evidence?

Obviously, the reason it's gotten this bad is that lobbying is legal and private campaign funding is mandatory. Thanks again, citizens united!

>>Kapura+kc1
1) steel and rail are important for survival, and actual monopolies that result you being only able to get a necessary good or service from 1 seller

2) there are a billion different ways to entertain yourself, including spending time on HN. It matters very little to real life that there are 5 different places to stream expensive media compared to 6. If they get too expensive, you can watch youtube or tiktok or come back to HN or whatever else.

>>lotsof+hR1
The pro-monopoly stance never ceases to amaze me. Competition is good, apparently, but multi-hundred-billion-dollar mergers are... also good? Make it make sense.

>>ventur+bd2
If you comprehend #2, you can see that it is not a pro monopoly stance.

Additionally, an anti monopoly stance for the purposes of buying a specific piece of content would be reducing copyright to 10 years.