zlacker

>>vismit+(OP)
I'm sorry, but what's the point here ? It's not for a job or improve a LLM or doing something useful per se, just to "enjoy" how version X or Y of an LLM can solve problems.

I don't want to sound grumpy or but it doesn't achieve anything, this is just a showcase of how a "calculator with a small probability of failure can succeed".

Move on, do something useful, don't stop being amazed by AI but please stop throwing it at my face.

>>az09mu+NF
Author is Peter Norvig, who has definitely done “something useful” when it comes to AI. He’s earned some time for play.