zlacker

[return to "Wolfram Compute Services"]
1. hebeje+N8[view] [source] 2025-12-06 09:34:25
>>nsoonh+(OP)
Man, I miss Wolfram Language. Once you've twisted your brain a little to grok its usage, it's such an incredibly high-value tool, especially for exploration and prototyping. I saw it more as a do-anything software tool for researchers rather than as a language aimed at programmers, so I put on a researcher hat and tried to forget everything I knew as a professional programmer, and had a few memorable seasons with it around 2016-2020. I remember calculating precisely which days of the year would cause the sunlight to pass through a window and some glass blocks in an internal wall, creating a beautiful light show indoors. It only took a couple of minutes to get a nice animated visualisation and a calendar.

Nowadays I'd probably just ask Claude to figure it out for me, but pre LLMs, WL was the highest value tool for thought in my toolbox.

(Edit: and they actually offer perpetual licenses!)

◧◩
2. dr_kis+bb[view] [source] 2025-12-06 10:04:25
>>hebeje+N8
Interesting. I have always felt I am missing out on not using tools like Mathematica or MatLab. I see some people doing everything using MatLab, including building GUI and DL models, which I found surprising for a single software suite, and - nowadays - one that is quite affordable (at least the home edition).

Mathematica seems a little pricey but maybe it would motivate me to learn more math.

I would love to read what non-mathematicians use MatLab, Mathematica, and Maple for.

◧◩◪
3. 3abito+Wc[view] [source] 2025-12-06 10:28:50
>>dr_kis+bb
To be fair it was used a lot during my physics studies. I opted to use it afterwards for integrals and derivations, very powerful.
◧◩◪◨
4. auxili+mg[view] [source] 2025-12-06 11:13:25
>>3abito+Wc
Yeah, I was one of those schmucks that used sympy / python instead of mathematica in my physics coursework. Policy was "mathematica is recommended and supported, but you can bring your own tools if you want to and can make them work."

In retrospect, doing the work in mathematica would have probably stretched my brain more (in a good way!) since it provides a different and powerful way of solving problems vs other languages...maybe I'll have to revisit it. Perhaps even try advent of code with it?

While python did get the job done, it feels like the ceiling (especially for power users) is so much higher in mathematica.

[go to top]