zlacker

[return to "Idempotency keys for exactly-once processing"]
1. attila+Deg[view] [source] 2025-12-05 23:31:30
>>defly+(OP)
does OP mean simply the identity of the message?

idempotency means something else to me.

◧◩
2. d4rkn0+KYg[view] [source] 2025-12-06 08:37:45
>>attila+Deg
I agree, this whole thread seems to turn the concept of idempotency on its head. As far as I know, an idempotent operation is one that can be repeated without ill-effect rather than the opposite which is a process that will cause errors if executed repeatedly.

The article doesn't propose anything especially different from Lamport clocks. What this article suggests is a way to deal with non-idempotent message handlers.

[go to top]