zlacker

[return to "Adenosine on the common path of rapid antidepressant action: The coffee paradox"]
1. k1musa+Vi[view] [source] 2025-12-06 00:26:03
>>PaulHo+(OP)
On chronic coffee consumption: "One meta-analysis found that RR coffee 0.757, RR caffeine 0.721 (12). Another one found RR 0.76, with an optimal protective effect at ∼400 mL/day (13). In comparison to many drug treatments that have an effect size in this range, this is not a small effect size. A risk reduction of 20 to 25% is quite impressive."

As if I needed another reason to drink coffee.

◧◩
2. boothb+Wj[view] [source] 2025-12-06 00:33:25
>>k1musa+Vi
One thing I've learned over the years is that specifically setting out to enjoy and appreciate something on a daily basis is beneficial to overall satisfaction with life. And for me, that's my morning cuppa before the rest of the house wakes up. Is it (just) the coffee or is it (also) the rituals surrounding coffee?
◧◩◪
3. reacto+al[view] [source] 2025-12-06 00:44:08
>>boothb+Wj
It’s 100% the addiction.

It’s ok, me too. At home I’m a 4-6 cup a day drinker. On the go 2-3 Starbucks. I have a serious problem.

◧◩◪◨
4. standa+ss[view] [source] 2025-12-06 01:56:46
>>reacto+al
Addiction to any given substance is highly variable from person to person, and there's a lot of data to back that up.

I recall a friend describing their struggle to quit caffeine, which I mocked at first, until I realized it sounded exactly like my brutal struggle to quit nicotine. Yet, plenty of people quit cigarettes effortlessly. Nicotine is one of the most variable, but caffeine, alcohol and cocaine vary widely too. I imagine we'd find this is the case for most substances if we had the data. In a sane world, we'd give every kid their addiction predisposition profile when they turn 13.

[go to top]