zlacker

>>flexdi+(OP)
Instead of "stacked diffs", isn't the more "continuous integration" solution to split a big feature into small chunks that actually get merged?

Having to rebase again and again is a symptom that a dev branch is living for too long.

>>mytail+G8f
I’m amazed that this comment is so low down

Stacked diffs seems like a solution to managing high WIP - but the best solution to high WIP is always to lower WIP

Absolutely everything gets easier when you lower your work in progress.

>>glenja+Eff
This seems idealistic. It's very normal to be working on a feature that depends on a not-yet-merged feature.

>>happyt+Dlf
> It's very normal to be working on a feature that depends on a not-yet-merged feature.

Oh sure, many bad ideas and poor practises such as that one are quite "normal". It's not a recommendation.