zlacker

[return to "Netflix to Acquire Warner Bros"]
1. afavou+Jd[view] [source] 2025-12-05 13:44:09
>>meetpa+(OP)
Any consolidation like this seems like a negative for consumers. But at least it wasn’t bought by Larry Ellison, as was considered very likely (assuming this merger gets approved, in the current administration you never know).

From a Hacker News perspective, I wonder what this means for engineers working on HBO Max. Netflix says they’re keeping the company separate but surely you’d be looking to move them to Netflix backend infrastructure at the very least.

◧◩
2. noneth+Rp[view] [source] 2025-12-05 14:43:08
>>afavou+Jd
> Any consolidation like this seems like a negative for consumers

This is a very common narrative to this news. But coming into this news, I think the most common narrative against streaming was essentially "There is not enough consolidation." People were happy when Netflix was the streaming service, but then everyone pulled their content and have their own (Disney, Paramount, etc.)

◧◩◪
3. yojo+Hs[view] [source] 2025-12-05 14:55:08
>>noneth+Rp
Netflix was also still in the “grow users at all cost” phase. They have since moved to “grow revenue at all costs.”

Everyone likes a service when it’s subsidized by VC dollars. Until they inevitably start turning the screws.

◧◩◪◨
4. jasode+nw[view] [source] 2025-12-05 15:12:00
>>yojo+Hs
>Everyone likes a service when it’s subsidized by VC dollars.

Netflix went public in 2002. It was +8 years later that the streaming-only service was launched in 2010. The digital streaming wasn't "subsidized by VC".

Netflix had more content from everybody back then because the other studios licensed their content for cheap prices to Netflix. But those studios then realized that Netflix was growing rapidly on the backs of their content. Once those multi-year contracts expired, studios like Disney didn't renew with Netflix and instead, started their own platform (e.g. Disney+).

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. sherma+fC[view] [source] 2025-12-05 15:37:48
>>jasode+nw
These content library contracts are only for a couple of years, and each time one lapses, some terms get negotiated. Nobody in the streaming industry is successful because they have a long term lock on someone else’s content. It’s all about eyeballs and margins.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. aidenn+tN[view] [source] 2025-12-05 16:19:20
>>sherma+fC
Netflix had a 4 year deal with Starz, which is where a significant chunk of their early streaming content came from (Including all the Disney films).
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
7. sherma+0O[view] [source] 2025-12-05 16:21:49
>>aidenn+tN
Sure, that was very early though. You could argue that was crucial for establishing their brand, but the industry has caught up and doesn't do that very much now.
[go to top]