zlacker

>>cheese+(OP)
> Grok ended up performing the best while DeepSeek came close to second. Almost all the models had a tech-heavy portfolio which led them to do well. Gemini ended up in last place since it was the only one that had a large portfolio of non-tech stocks.

I'm not an investor or researcher, but this triggers my spidey sense... it seems to imply they aren't measuring what they think they are.

>>bcrosb+l2
I don't feel like they measured anything. They just confirmed that tech stocks in the US did pretty well.

>>etchal+R2
They measured the investment facility of all those LLMs. That's pretty much what the title says. And they had dramatically different outcomes. So that tells me something.

>>JoeAlt+l5
They "proved" that US tech stocks did better than portfolios with less US tech stocks over a recent, very short time range. 1. You didn't know that? 2. Whata re you going to do with this "new information"?