zlacker

[return to "Why are 38 percent of Stanford students saying they're disabled?"]
1. dctoed+Ge[view] [source] 2025-12-04 19:21:18
>>delich+(OP)
I'm mostly a law professor these days. When final-exam time rolls around (as in, this week), I raise my eyebrows when I'm sent the list of students who get 50% extra time. I wouldn't presume to judge the propriety of any given student's accommodation. But many of the accommodated students seem to have done just fine in class discussions during the semester.

FTA: "Unnecessary accommodations are a two-front form of cheating—they give you an unjust leg-up on your fellow students, but they also allow you to cheat yourself out of genuine intellectual growth."

◧◩
2. Sparkl+yC[view] [source] 2025-12-04 21:09:18
>>dctoed+Ge
I don't see how getting 50% extra time on exams is anything remotely close to cheating. Almost nothing I do in my day to day job comes close to being as time-boxed or arbitrarily restrictive as exams were in college.
◧◩◪
3. next_x+SI[view] [source] 2025-12-04 21:43:18
>>Sparkl+yC
Class rank is a primary factor for top law jobs open to new law school graduates. MCAT scores play a huge role in med school admissions. Etc.

Like it or not, there are life changing impacts to others by cheating at this stuff. This is unambiguously cheating.

[go to top]