zlacker

[return to "Valve reveals it’s the architect behind a push to bring Windows games to Arm"]
1. adverb+H53[view] [source] 2025-12-03 18:47:45
>>evolve+(OP)
Everything valve doing for linux is making such a huge impact.

The HL3 memes don't even seem fair to use anymore. I don't even want to un-seriously make joke fun of them at this point. They are just genuinely doing so much for the community.

◧◩
2. levoca+Yb3[view] [source] 2025-12-03 19:19:32
>>adverb+H53
Valve is one of the few companies regularly seen on HN where the headline is something like "[company] is secretly doing something really great" as opposed to "[company] is secretly doing something evil"
◧◩◪
3. Tulliu+2d3[view] [source] 2025-12-03 19:24:24
>>levoca+Yb3
People complain about the gambling/loot box stuff, and yeah there's legit ethical concerns there.

But overall Valve just seems straightforwardly less shitty towards the consumer than other major companies in their space, by a long shot.

◧◩◪◨
4. xbmcus+EA3[view] [source] 2025-12-03 21:16:37
>>Tulliu+2d3
The major reason is they are a private company with good business. The don't have a need to keep adding to shareholder value ie stock price instead just need to generate a yearly income. We have reached a point where the shareholders are a companies real customers and that is who they all try to attract.Everytthing else a company does is just to attract shareholders
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. quitit+w24[view] [source] 2025-12-03 23:54:55
>>xbmcus+EA3
>We have reached a point where the shareholders are a companies real customers and that is who they all try to attract.

We currently have a handful of AI companies who make no profit, have revenue far below operating costs, their entire business runs on investment and they're posturing themselves for IPOs. Meaning that the reason they can keep the lights on solely comes from attracting investors (and will likely be that way for the foreseeable future).

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. ghurta+I44[view] [source] 2025-12-04 00:10:13
>>quitit+w24
That's not unique to AI though. That's very common for tech startups.

If they keep doing it, it must be because sometimes it works.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
7. positr+Gf4[view] [source] 2025-12-04 01:43:19
>>ghurta+I44
What doesn't work are the predictions of Uber's collapse, of which there were many, cheered on by a great deal who still gather here looking for the next things to see through.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯
8. iknows+0k4[view] [source] 2025-12-04 02:24:48
>>positr+Gf4
I am personally betting on Uber’s collapse for the obvious reason: it won’t compete with robotaxis and AV companies would rather have customers on their own apps rather than Uber’s platform.

Just unsure about the timing

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯▣
9. palata+PO4[view] [source] 2025-12-04 08:02:17
>>iknows+0k4
> Just unsure about the timing

Right after we get nuclear fusion and a million people on Mars.

[go to top]