zlacker

[return to "Valve reveals it’s the architect behind a push to bring Windows games to Arm"]
1. adverb+H53[view] [source] 2025-12-03 18:47:45
>>evolve+(OP)
Everything valve doing for linux is making such a huge impact.

The HL3 memes don't even seem fair to use anymore. I don't even want to un-seriously make joke fun of them at this point. They are just genuinely doing so much for the community.

◧◩
2. levoca+Yb3[view] [source] 2025-12-03 19:19:32
>>adverb+H53
Valve is one of the few companies regularly seen on HN where the headline is something like "[company] is secretly doing something really great" as opposed to "[company] is secretly doing something evil"
◧◩◪
3. Tulliu+2d3[view] [source] 2025-12-03 19:24:24
>>levoca+Yb3
People complain about the gambling/loot box stuff, and yeah there's legit ethical concerns there.

But overall Valve just seems straightforwardly less shitty towards the consumer than other major companies in their space, by a long shot.

◧◩◪◨
4. MattDa+4N3[view] [source] 2025-12-03 22:19:03
>>Tulliu+2d3
Let's be honest about this current situation.

Valve pushing for Linux gaming is for survival, not charity.

Windows is closing in on them: stricter kernel access (tougher time for anti-cheat)

Encouraging users to use the app store, or more accurately: discouraging users to install from binary

They threaten Valve's business model, and Valve is responding with proton & SteamOS

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. Tulliu+pT3[view] [source] 2025-12-03 22:53:46
>>MattDa+4N3
They're doing things that are simultaneously good for business and good for consumers.

That contrasts against the companies doing things that are good for business (at least short term) and bad for consumers.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. energy+Ab4[view] [source] 2025-12-04 01:04:00
>>Tulliu+pT3
Sure but it's just being morally lucky. They found themself in a situation where there was temporary and situational alignment, why give them any credit for that? They didn't create that situation.

It's like AMD open sourcing FSR or Meta open sourcing Llama. The outcome itself is good, but if they ever become leaders in these verticals, they will pivot to closed source quicker than you can blink, because the reason they're doing it is just coincidental to the public good, not because of a genuine motivation to do good.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
7. harral+Zf4[view] [source] 2025-12-04 01:47:16
>>energy+Ab4
I strongly disagree with this approach in life.

I am “morally lucky” because every decision I make is to ensure I can always be morally lucky, 10 years later. I take certain kinds of jobs in certain kinds of industries.

It’s my same approach to reducing stress or getting things done. I never get a parking ticket not because I’m amazing — it’s because I know if I have to go out later and move my car, I’ll forget, so I’ll just park right the first time. 10 years later and no parking tickets and no stress — if someone tells me “oh you’re just lucky,” I can only chuckle.

[go to top]