zlacker

[return to "Anthropic acquires Bun"]
1. andrew+P4[view] [source] 2025-12-02 18:28:07
>>ryanvo+(OP)
I’ll be honest, while I have my doubts about the match of interests and cohesion between an AI company and a JS runtime company I have to say this is the single best acquisition announcement blog post I’ve seen in 20 years or so.

Very direct, very plain and detailed. They cover all the bases about the why, the how, and what to expect. I really appreciate it.

Best of luck to the team and hopefully the new home will support them well.

◧◩
2. raw_an+i8[view] [source] 2025-12-02 18:41:20
>>andrew+P4
But how is another company that is also VC backed and losing money providing stability for Bun?

How long before we hear about “Our Amazing Journey”?

On the other hand, I would rather see someone like Bun have a successful exit where the founders seem to have started out with a passion project, got funding, built something out they were excited about and then exit than yet another AI company by non technical founders who were built with the sole purpose of getting funding and then exit.

◧◩◪
3. simonw+29[view] [source] 2025-12-02 18:44:18
>>raw_an+i8
Anthropic may be losing money, but a company with $7bn revenue run rate (https://www.anthropic.com/news/statement-dario-amodei-americ...) is a whole lot healthier than a company with a revenue of 0.
◧◩◪◨
4. tyingq+ue[view] [source] 2025-12-02 19:05:12
>>simonw+29
If I had the cash, I could sell dollar bills for 50 cents and do a $7b run rate :)
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. simonw+Vf[view] [source] 2025-12-02 19:10:31
>>tyingq+ue
If that was genuinely happening here - Anthropic were selling inference for less than the power and data center costs needed to serve those tokens - it would indeed be a very bad sign for their health.

I don't think they're doing that.

Estimates I've seen have their inference margin at ~60% - there's one from Morgan Stanley in this article, for example: https://www.businessinsider.com/amazon-anthropic-billions-cl...

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. holler+3i[view] [source] 2025-12-02 19:18:23
>>simonw+Vf
The leaders of Anthropic, OpenAI and DeepMind all hope to create models that are much more powerful than the ones they have now.

A large portion of the many tens of billions of dollars they have at their disposal (OpenAI alone raised 40 billion in April) is probably going toward this ambition—basically a huge science experiment. For example, when an AI lab offers an individual researcher a $250 million pay package, it can only be because they hope that the researcher can help them with something very ambitious: there's no need to pay that much for a single employee to help them reduce the costs of serving the paying customers they have now.

The point is that you can be right that Anthropic is making money on the marginal new user of Claude, but Anthropic's investors might still get soaked if the huge science experiment does not bear fruit.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
7. JumpCr+4k[view] [source] 2025-12-02 19:27:40
>>holler+3i
> their investors might still take a bath if the very-ambitious aspect of their operations do not bear fruit

Not really. If the technology stalls where it is, AI still have a sizable chunk of the dollars previously paid to coders, transcribers, translators and the like.

[go to top]