zlacker

[return to "What influence has the BBC had on history?"]
1. Petera+Xc8[view] [source] 2025-11-20 08:03:29
>>pepys+(OP)
The BBC gets to say what history is because it documents the now. Farage does not have the popular support tha Corbyn had (has?) but you'd never believe it counting the number of interviews Farage gets with the BeeB. The game, as with Wikipedia, is to convince everyone you're unbiased and truthful and then sell us something. The question really is the relationship between the people's will (assuming you think democracy is a good idea) and the BBC's agenda setting.
◧◩
2. Angost+cg8[view] [source] 2025-11-20 08:35:36
>>Petera+Xc8
The polling suggests Farage absolutely does have that support. BBC coverage reflects that. And I hate the man
◧◩◪
3. Petera+F69[view] [source] 2025-11-20 15:27:35
>>Angost+cg8
And you are talking of current polling. I believe you will find that in Corbyn's hayday the polling was suggesting he would sweep labour to power.. but with the wrong politics. Hence being pro Palestinian was turned (in the bbc reporting) into "anti Semitic".
◧◩◪◨
4. rat87+D0a[view] [source] 2025-11-20 20:14:06
>>Petera+F69
Corbyn failed because he was a bad politician with extreme views. It was Corbyn not the media who covered him that chose to defend every antisemite they could find. If anything the media was too nice to him(the media is often too worried about false balance you get similar things with Trump). It's entirely unsurprising that he lost what would have been a labor victory without him
[go to top]