zlacker

[return to "What influence has the BBC had on history?"]
1. moltar+o88[view] [source] 2025-11-20 07:19:18
>>pepys+(OP)
When the Soviet Union fell apart BBC opened a number of journalism schools in Russia. The schools were sponsored by George Soros. My dad attended one of those and then was called into FSB office (former KGB) to be questioned.

My suspicion to this day is that these schools were both a spy front and long-game propaganda, where they were teaching how to make news more western-aligned.

Why would BBC want to teach their methods in Russia? How do they benefit from that? How does Soros benefit from that?

◧◩
2. notepa+Ab8[view] [source] 2025-11-20 07:51:28
>>moltar+o88
The goal there is similar to why the US state department sponsored the Tor project. They want a democratic society in Russia, and they want the Russian people to have friendly views of the west. The objective wasn't so much to teach them their ways, but to establish rapport with the journalism community in Russia. Journalists decide if for example Putin's power grabbing and dictatorship is covered as a negative or a positive thing. That rapport goes a long way with influencing their unavoidable bias. I think "influence" is correct, not "propaganda" unless there was specific messaging being disseminated.

Also, look up "confucius institutes" all over the US and the world setup the Chinese government to do something similar.

◧◩◪
3. sudden+El8[view] [source] 2025-11-20 09:19:47
>>notepa+Ab8
>They want a democratic society in Russia

They don't give a damn about democracy. There's a reason they stole plenty of elections across Europe and Latin America. Hell, they even helped steal the 1996 Russian election.

◧◩◪◨
4. pjc50+yu8[view] [source] 2025-11-20 10:40:35
>>sudden+El8
> stole plenty of elections across Europe and Latin America. Hell, they even helped steal the 1996 Russian election.

[citation needed]; I'm aware of all the Latin America badness, School of the Americas, Nicaragua, Allende, etc, but I don't know what you're referring to here and you do actually need to support claims of ballot rigging with evidence.

But yes, this fundamental tension in American "state building" was being unable to handle cases when the foreign public wanted a democracy that wasn't run by and for the benefit of US corporations or right-wing Christians. You can see it propagating backwards now America has its own Pinochet.

[go to top]