zlacker

[return to "Exploring the limits of large language models as quant traders"]
1. vita77+F8[view] [source] 2025-11-19 09:05:54
>>rzk+(OP)
This is very thoughtful and interesting. It's worth noting that this is just a start and in future iterations they're planning to give the LLMs much more to work with (e.g. news feeds). It's somewhat predictable that LLMs did poorly with quantitative data only (prices) but I'm very curious to see how they perform once they can read the news and Twitter sentiment.
◧◩
2. Lapsa+va[view] [source] 2025-11-19 09:18:27
>>vita77+F8
I would argue that sentiment classification is where LLMs perform best. folks are already using it for precisely such purpose - have even built a public index out of it
◧◩◪
3. ritonl+0g[view] [source] 2025-11-19 10:13:45
>>Lapsa+va
what index ?
◧◩◪◨
4. Lapsa+391[view] [source] 2025-11-19 16:05:39
>>ritonl+0g
sorry dude. tried going down the rabbit hole but I'm too lazy and uninterested in it. read about it month ago or so. perhaps Daily News Sentiment Index uses LLMs, not sure. if you go long enough through https://quantocracy.com/ you should be able to find it
[go to top]