zlacker

>>thsNam+(OP)
Amusing to see what Grokipedia thinks of various cities.

And no surprise, apartheid apologetics: https://grokipedia.com/page/Apartheid#debunking-prevailing-n...

Hilarious factual errors in https://grokipedia.com/page/Green_Line_(CTA)

>>cozzyd+Xz
You can select text, and send factual errors to be fixed. If you found something wrong in that article you should submit some fixes.

>>sergio+EC
Why would you do free work for a company which is planning to profit from your labor? Wikipedia/Wikimedia is a non-profit. All of their money pays for real expenses instead of whatever vanity project Musk has decided is necessary to sell xAI to the masses.

>>measur+hF
"All of their money pays for real expenses"

Not true, nearly 30% of their budget goes to partisan activism with DEI related initiatives.

"Supporting equity represents the second largest part of our programmatic work"

https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_Annual_...

>>txcwg0+yJ1
that's a real expense. who else on earth should be doing DEI initiatives if not the goddamn chroniclers of human experience?

>>undeve+pe2
Definitely not an encyclopedia that is supposed to be objective.

>>txcwg0+aR2
How do you think you can reach anything close to objectivity without aiming for diversity and inclusion? What do you think will happen to an encyclopaedia which is mostly run by Elon fans? We already had that at one of the extremes (and the echos are still here) from the time medicine just didn't bother to study women.