zlacker

[return to "Grokipedia by xAI"]
1. cozzyd+Xz[view] [source] 2025-10-28 02:33:01
>>thsNam+(OP)
Amusing to see what Grokipedia thinks of various cities.

And no surprise, apartheid apologetics: https://grokipedia.com/page/Apartheid#debunking-prevailing-n...

Hilarious factual errors in https://grokipedia.com/page/Green_Line_(CTA)

◧◩
2. sergio+EC[view] [source] 2025-10-28 03:06:46
>>cozzyd+Xz
You can select text, and send factual errors to be fixed. If you found something wrong in that article you should submit some fixes.
◧◩◪
3. measur+hF[view] [source] 2025-10-28 03:45:16
>>sergio+EC
Why would you do free work for a company which is planning to profit from your labor? Wikipedia/Wikimedia is a non-profit. All of their money pays for real expenses instead of whatever vanity project Musk has decided is necessary to sell xAI to the masses.
◧◩◪◨
4. txcwg0+yJ1[view] [source] 2025-10-28 14:09:46
>>measur+hF
"All of their money pays for real expenses"

Not true, nearly 30% of their budget goes to partisan activism with DEI related initiatives.

"Supporting equity represents the second largest part of our programmatic work"

https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_Foundation_Annual_...

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. undeve+pe2[view] [source] 2025-10-28 16:32:04
>>txcwg0+yJ1
that's a real expense. who else on earth should be doing DEI initiatives if not the goddamn chroniclers of human experience?
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. txcwg0+aR2[view] [source] 2025-10-28 19:10:57
>>undeve+pe2
Definitely not an encyclopedia that is supposed to be objective.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
7. a0123+al3[view] [source] 2025-10-28 21:15:28
>>txcwg0+aR2
When you grow up to be an adult, you will understand that "objectivity"is a fiction.

And an encyclopedia can absolutely do that and still present factual information based on actual research and facts.

You know that just because a lady has blue hair or a person has colored skin does NOT mean that they can't be right about something or do good research. Right? You do know it, right?

Because in the end, when you cry about DEI (whatever you believe it to mean), this is the implication that comes with it: that you can't imagine for a second that anyone who doesn't look exactly like you could ever do anything competently. I genuinely wonder if you've ever thought about that for more than half a second after you closed that Charlie Kirk video.

If you do believe it, fair enough. I guess you're allowed to believe it. But at least be honest about it.

[go to top]