zlacker

>>imicha+(OP)
Can someone give me a deeper understanding of what this post means or the backstory behind it?

>>Imusta+89
As an early WP editor, I can relate ... the project caught -a lot- of crap back in the early days. This is a smug but accurate, simple recounting of that sordid tale, and the value that WP retains now that AI is around to cite it.

I don't edit much any more, but although it's not perfect, it's retinue of backup resources (including links to Wayback for those which died) remains invaluable.

>>8bitsr+Zb
I remember being told in school that we shouldn't use Wikipedia (not just for citations, but at all) because anyone can edit it. We were told to use other websites directly, or better yet: paper books.

I would get in trouble for "talking back" when I pointed out that anyone can make a website or write a book, too.