zlacker

[return to "Imgur pulls out of UK as data watchdog threatens fine"]
1. darkam+XF2[view] [source] 2025-10-01 07:13:50
>>ANewbu+(OP)
Serious question: why are people siding with Imgur here, instead of blaming the company that chose to ignore the laws of the country it operates in?

Imgur's business model is ad sales and tracking users - that inherently requires collecting and protecting data, including vulnerable groups like children. Even if the UK rules are imperfect or possibly overbroad (I haven't read them), if a company choose to operate where a law applies, it's on the company to follow it or to challenge it through the courts, not to blame the regulator after the fact.

◧◩
2. a5c11+9W2[view] [source] 2025-10-01 10:32:38
>>darkam+XF2
Stupid laws mustn't be followed.

> requires collecting and protecting data

Thanks to OSA, service providers have to collect even more data from users, including face scans and IDs. They usually outsource that process to third party companies, which obviously are registered in Cyprus or another shady country. We can expect a massive leak in a near future, and no one will be prosecuted, though you will receive a letter from the government saying: "We are really sorry for the leak of your data, we weren't able to get in touch with the data processing company, so we kindly ask you to revoke your passport and apply for a new one. Stay vigilant as someone might use your identity for illegal purposes".

> including vulnerable groups like children

The "vulnerable group" is proficient at using VPNs. Ironically, the new law affects older generations the most.

[go to top]