zlacker

[return to "Imgur pulls out of UK as data watchdog threatens fine"]
1. sammy2+xd[view] [source] 2025-09-30 14:13:15
>>ANewbu+(OP)
How do you "pull out" of the UK if you are not a UK company, you are a US company, hosted in the US, and proxied by Fastly. There's nothing to do? You do not need to abide by UK laws, even if your website is accessible from there.
◧◩
2. layer8+zb1[view] [source] 2025-09-30 18:42:36
>>sammy2+xd
You are sending data into the UK, hence you have to abide by their laws regarding said data.
◧◩◪
3. patric+Ie1[view] [source] 2025-09-30 18:57:17
>>layer8+zb1
As the owner of a U.S. based website, I am not sending data anywhere. Some people in the U.K. might request data and download it from my site. I'm not forcing it on them.
◧◩◪◨
4. layer8+4h1[view] [source] 2025-09-30 19:08:13
>>patric+Ie1
HTTP responses (website contents) are data that the web servers you are paying for are sending. People can’t download anything from your site without your servers sending the data. Nothing forces you to send that data when you receive an HTTP request. Indeed, geoblocking is a common way to prevent sending data to jurisdictions whose laws the sending of the data might be in violation of.
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. betaby+yn1[view] [source] 2025-09-30 19:36:57
>>layer8+4h1
HTTP GET is pull, not push. The user is pulling data, not the server is pushing data. Government doesn't care though. It intentionally have chosen not to understand that detail.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. layer8+rr1[view] [source] 2025-09-30 19:54:51
>>betaby+yn1
It’s the server’s choice to send or not to send the data. The fact that the server is receiving a request for the data in no way implies that it has to obey it. If someone places an order for a product whose distribution violates a law, the distributor is still responsible for sending it. Someone selling drugs is still responsible even if the buyer requested the drug. Someone distributing unlicensed material is still responsible even when that material was specifically requested.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
7. betaby+mV1[view] [source] 2025-09-30 22:57:53
>>layer8+rr1
NO, bad analogy. A shop in Amsterdam sells shrums in Amsterdam, which is legal. User from UK buys shrums, transaction happens in Amsterdam, which is legal. User brings shrums to UK, that's illegal and the user is liable, not the shop in Amsterdam.
[go to top]