zlacker

>>testru+(OP)
At this point, I'm not sure anyone sees Wikipedia as accurate. It's controlled by a handful of (usually activist) moderators that block any updates that oppose their personal beliefs, even if true.

>>billy9+G3
The edit history is public. If you think an article has been tampered with, it's just as easy to verify as a bug in Open Source code.

Plus, if you're citing Wikipedia verbatim instead of using it as an aggregator for secondary sources, you're using it wrong.