zlacker

[return to "UK Petition: Do not introduce Digital ID cards"]
1. dijit+N2[view] [source] 2025-09-28 18:23:32
>>DamonH+(OP)
As well as the Estonia eID system works (aside from that time it got hacked[0] and that other time they leaked all the photos[1]) and how well a digital (non-government) system works in Scandinavia… I have to say…

As a Dual British/Swedish Citizen, I really do not trust the UK government. They have proven over and over and over, that at every opportunity presented they will increase their own authority. I don’t believe I have personally witnessed any other advanced economy that so ardently marches towards authoritarianism.

So, no matter if it’s a good idea or not. I can’t in good faith advise the UK having more powers. Unfortunately the UK government themselves can sort of just grant themselves more power. So…

[0]: https://e-estonia.com/card-security-risk/

[1]: https://therecord.media/estonia-says-a-hacker-downloaded-286...

◧◩
2. skelet+fj[view] [source] 2025-09-28 20:22:14
>>dijit+N2
Our system in Estonia works well.

I don't get the resistance to a digital/national id in other countries. To us it is quite bizarre.

Some have explained it with a lack of trust between citizens and the country.

But without such digital id it is impossible to have such digital government services as we have here. The government services need to verify and autheticate the citizen, so they only access their own data and not someone who has the same name and birth date by accident.

I don't see how such a system gives the government more powers. It already has all the data on its citizens, but it is spread out, fragmented, stored with multiple conflicting versions, maybe some of it is stored in databases where no one cares about security, etc.

◧◩◪
3. gslepa+Do[view] [source] 2025-09-28 21:02:10
>>skelet+fj
> I don't get the resistance to a digital/national id in other countries. To us it is quite bizarre.

It depends on the country and its relationship with the people. If the people trust that their government represents the people's interests, there is little push-back. In countries where citizens have reason to believe their government is hijacked by interests that do not have their best interests at heart, then every move is viewed with suspicion.

In this case people are tying Digital ID to CBDCs and social credit systems, which is a reasonable thing to do, given this is exactly how China uses them to enforce 15-minute cities with checkpoints between them. All citizens conversations are tracked, their movements are restricted as well [1], and their ability to purchase goods & services are tightly regulated based on their behavior via the social credit system. This is the world that people who are pushing back against this are trying to avoid.

[1] https://x.com/songpinganq/status/1972382547427590401

◧◩◪◨
4. tombot+as[view] [source] 2025-09-28 21:27:13
>>gslepa+Do
UK already has a social credit system with our credit score, we even need to pay to see it.
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. pipes+Kt[view] [source] 2025-09-28 21:36:00
>>tombot+as
That's a financial score based on previous financial transactions and contracts. It's a bit of a stretch to call it social.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. asdff+VK[view] [source] 2025-09-29 00:40:07
>>pipes+Kt
Well, in the U.S. at least it literally determines where you are allowed to live. I don't know how you couldn't call it a social credit system.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
7. animal+7O[view] [source] 2025-09-29 01:17:55
>>asdff+VK
It’s not a social credit system because it doesn’t weight your social involvement in the society (political party, school credentials, race) but rather payment history, amount of debt, types of credit
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯
8. asdff+IP[view] [source] 2025-09-29 01:35:49
>>animal+7O
Simply things that correlate to social involvement I suppose. Quacks like a duck and all.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯▣
9. pkaode+0Q[view] [source] 2025-09-29 01:40:46
>>asdff+IP
What are you on about? It's financial providers deciding whether you are or aren't risky for them to work with, based on your financial decisions.

Not repaying loans and using credit cards to get cash -> you're probably bad with money -> lenders are unlikely to get their money back from you.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯▣▦
10. Timoro+iR[view] [source] 2025-09-29 01:59:38
>>pkaode+0Q
> based on your financial decisions

A lot of individuals saw their credit scores decline during the Great Recession, even if they weren’t involved in subprime lending.

This myth that credit scores are entirely due to your own financial decisions is up there with myths people believe about names or time zones.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯▣▦▧
11. pipes+u81[view] [source] 2025-09-29 06:16:49
>>Timoro+iR
Was that related to their social interactions and associated with or being related to political activists? That's how China's scoring works.
[go to top]