zlacker

[return to "Evanston orders Flock to remove reinstalled cameras"]
1. donmcr+G8[view] [source] 2025-09-26 05:24:17
>>ptk+(OP)
Even though it's become commonplace in the last 20 years, I'm still shocked to see how companies can pretty much ignore the law, do whatever they want, and have everyone involved shielded from any kind of significant consequences.

In situations like this, I think the person at the top of the chain that told employees to perform the illegal installations should be arrested and charged. On top of that, the company should be fined into bankruptcy. If the directors knew about it any companies they're involved with shouldn't be allowed to conduct future business in the municipality (or state).

◧◩
2. hdgvhi+Lj[view] [source] 2025-09-26 07:10:29
>>donmcr+G8
Confiscate the shares. No compensation. Effectively nationalisation as punishment.

Solves the “too big to fail” problem as the company continues to exist, the ceo ends up in jail and the owners end up broke, but the work still gets done.

◧◩◪
3. JumpCr+Fk[view] [source] 2025-09-26 07:17:38
>>hdgvhi+Lj
> Confiscate the shares. No compensation

This is better than corporate death penalties but still more complicated than fines. Massive fines are the answer.

> Solves the “too big to fail” problem as the company continues to exist, the ceo ends up in jail and the owners end up broke

So do fines and bankruptcy. CEO won’t go to jail, but they’ll spend the rest of their lives fighting shareholder lawsuits. Feed them to the wolves.

◧◩◪◨
4. forgot+Vm[view] [source] 2025-09-26 07:40:13
>>JumpCr+Fk
> CEO won’t go to jail, but they’ll spend the rest of their lives fighting shareholder lawsuits.

One important lesson to be learned from the past 20 years: if you're sued, don't go to court. If you're dragged to court, say "fuck you, I'm not going and I'm not paying." If you have enough money, they literally will not do anything. They'll just have endless sham court cases that you're free to ignore and there will never be any consequences.

Alex Jones is up to a few billion dollars in settlements against him. He's had court cases against him for, what, over 10 years now? He's still running his show, still getting money, and he's openly mocking the courts. Judges don't care. Whatever people work in the frameworks that allegedly exist to enforce judgments don't care. They're getting their salary either way.

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. close0+Lr[view] [source] 2025-09-26 08:28:58
>>forgot+Vm
I think you're reading the wrong lesson from this. If someone cares enough to take you down, your strategy isn't just useless, it's actively harming you. It's a "for my friends everything, for my enemies the law" situation.

A better lesson is that you can be "on the radar" but far enough from the central hotspot that you are not a priority. Alternatively you need someone to have your back and be your heatshield while you keep trudging along.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. Slight+Oy[view] [source] 2025-09-26 09:41:05
>>close0+Lr
The actual takeaway here is the newly formed Soviet United States of America.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
7. MangoT+3S2[view] [source] 2025-09-27 05:55:44
>>Slight+Oy
The soviets had better healthcare funding and lower rates of homelessness. We may be collectively richer than the soviets, but our state hates us more, and the people who run most of this privatized country (ie, capitalists—board members, executives, and rich shareholders) have more contempt for us than soviet politicians and apparatchiks ever could muster.
[go to top]