zlacker

[return to "EU age verification app not planning desktop support"]
1. bileka+vb[view] [source] 2025-09-24 13:07:53
>>sschue+(OP)
This is a great example of how this whole requirement hasn't been properly thought out.

> Desktop support is not currently within the project's scope.

What I would like to take from this is that, by their own definition, desktop apps are out of scope for Age Verification. So does that mean we will see a return of the 'desktop applications' instead of everything being a web service ?

One can dream perhaps. Until then adults who are willing to 'do what they're told' will be the ones who are inconvenienced by this constantly.

Edit: Also this will completely disable any new phone OS' being developed. Why would anyone bother when you can't verify your wallet to do anything online.

◧◩
2. j0057+4r[view] [source] 2025-09-24 14:16:25
>>bileka+vb
> Also this will completely disable any new phone OS' being developed. Why would anyone bother when you can't verify your wallet to do anything online.

This already the case today, you can't run your bank's app or government eID apps on anything but Google or Apple devices.

◧◩◪
3. logifa+wB[view] [source] 2025-09-24 15:04:24
>>j0057+4r
> you can't run your bank's app

I can log in to my bank account using my desktop PC

> government eID apps

I can sign into government websites using my desktop PC and its smart card reader and my government-issued eID smartcard. No smartphone needed.

◧◩◪◨
4. okanat+sG[view] [source] 2025-09-24 15:26:19
>>logifa+wB
Not in EU. Many banks mandate you either have an iPhone or Google approved Android as 2FA. Those fucking idiots have killed their own competition options.
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. Basilo+161[view] [source] 2025-09-24 17:17:53
>>okanat+sG
While everyone took the opportunity to reply to you with "Not in my bank/country/to-my-awareness" This is what's happening in Portugal:

https://old.reddit.com/r/portugal/comments/1msc886/obriga%C3...

Effectively, if the client doesn't download the App, they will never be able to log into the homebanking website again. The bank enforced this and now if you login normally it will redirect to a page where you can download the app or use up one of three remaining chances to login. I am down to two. From now on, I'm only able to use ATM's or go to an actual teller to make payments and such. The app requires that I have a Google account or an Apple account and I think that's just messed up, specially for a Portuguese bank.

The app on the google store is pt.novobanco.nbsmarter if anyone is curious. It has interesting permissions as well.

Edit: This is the landing page (one login left, oh dear...) https://files.catbox.moe/x117iy.png

rsync, here you go:

https://reports.exodus-privacy.eu.org/en/reports/652314/

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. eikenb+ot1[view] [source] 2025-09-24 19:13:06
>>Basilo+161
You say "The bank"... does this mean Portugal only has one bank? If not, wouldn't this be a good reason so change banks? Maybe to a credit union (bank co-op) if they have those in Portugal as the members generally have much more of a say.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
7. Basilo+WA1[view] [source] 2025-09-24 19:53:40
>>eikenb+ot1
When I wrote "the bank" I meant, the bank in question, which is the one mentioned in the URL. Hope this makes it clearer for you.

As for alternatives, yes there are, I'm still figuring which ones do not require an app on the smart-phone, though.

I believe I've found a fair alternative after asking a few friends but, I have to account for other factors as well, like, how secure their infrastructure is.

This is because offline 2FA keyfobs were never that popular in Portugal (to my knowledge), unlike 2FA via SMS which I find less secure that keyfobs, but now with the SCA directives from the EU, most banks are jumping on the App 2FA bandwagon. Some do offer a government issued alternative [0] but it still requires an app. I'd be perfectly happy to sign in with my Citizen's ID card reader but that is also rarely implemented (bank-wise), specially since the Chave Movel Digital app from the government [0].

Bottom line, most major banks are going in one direction (deploying their own apps onto customer devices), while smaller banks are staying put (with SMS 2FA) but their security was never that great. So I'm still prospecting and yes, there's a bank co-op on my list also.

Oh, and by "security" I'm mostly going by feel here. Like, if the web interface is a bit jankie I don't feel secure. I'm not going to look into obfuscated .js and pretend like I know anything about web security.

[0] https://www.autenticacao.gov.pt/a-chave-movel-digital

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯
8. Goblin+n62[view] [source] 2025-09-24 23:23:22
>>Basilo+WA1
Just use a strong password, then 2fa is redundant.
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔⧯▣
9. geggo9+ub3[view] [source] 2025-09-25 10:40:17
>>Goblin+n62
Not sure where gp lives. But most banks here restrict you to 4 digits as the password. So basically a PIN. If you are lucky, you get 6 digits or even letters. But be careful: if you use “fancy letters” (symbols, umlauts, …) you risk locking your account: you will be able to set this password, but the actual login form won’t allow you to enter it. Banks here are highly regulated, so don’t hope for competent competition.

They mitigate the obvious security thread with mandatory 2fa (actually mandated by regulation). Some use this as an opportunity to push their apps: no separate 2fa method, but only integrated in their bloated app, that checks for rooted devices and only supports the newest OS.

It’s quite hard to find out in advance, what 2fa methods with which fees each bank actually requires. I remember that some of them had funny ideas, what a customer should be billed for 2fa SMS. I think it was 50 cents per SMS.

[go to top]