zlacker

>>sschue+(OP)
This is a great example of how this whole requirement hasn't been properly thought out.

> Desktop support is not currently within the project's scope.

What I would like to take from this is that, by their own definition, desktop apps are out of scope for Age Verification. So does that mean we will see a return of the 'desktop applications' instead of everything being a web service ?

One can dream perhaps. Until then adults who are willing to 'do what they're told' will be the ones who are inconvenienced by this constantly.

Edit: Also this will completely disable any new phone OS' being developed. Why would anyone bother when you can't verify your wallet to do anything online.

>>bileka+vb
This read more like "we thought pc was a dead relic of the past" sadly

>>qiine+yc
Well, looking around I see more people using smartphones for anything and even not having a PC…

>>ktosob+El
I've seen this as well. It's getting increasingly normal, but I cannot imagine doing the same myself.

There's a much bigger likelihood of me going back to a feature-phone, compared to me starting to use my phone for anything but the absolute basics.

>>mrweas+Qr
Same, but I also have other quirks and that doesn't mean this is TheTrueWay and everyone should adapt to it :)