zlacker

>>bradge+(OP)
I wasn't expecting such a nice writeup. Worth a read.

The Ruby community has been eating itself alive since almost the beginning, but it is sad to see the short-sighted destruction of trust and connection that this has had.

>>leakyc+U1
I don't know anything about Ruby so forgive my ignorance. As I understand it there were repos required to run the RubyGems Service. This was of interest to major corporate players. Instead of removing the original authors, why didn't they just fork the requirements?

And wouldn't that constitute a violation of ownership? Or did the authors wave that away by joining the respective GitHub org in the first place?