zlacker

[return to "Charlie Kirk killed at event in Utah"]
1. pxc+Y03[view] [source] 2025-09-11 17:03:40
>>david9+(OP)
There was a school shooting on the same day as Kirk's death: https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/students-wounded-shooti...

If he were still alive, he would be writing and speaking about how such violence is unfortunate but ultimately acceptable— even necessary— to "preserve our freedoms", brushing it aside to be forgotten. He of course did so many times in life, notably in 2023 when he was quoted doing so in the media:

https://www.newsweek.com/charlie-kirk-says-gun-deaths-worth-...

Kirk's death has already overshadowed the news of that school shooting, which will indeed be forgotten by most long before we stop talking about him.

One final victory for Charlie Kirk, I guess.

◧◩
2. xtract+KY5[view] [source] 2025-09-12 18:37:57
>>pxc+Y03
I'm very late to this thread, because I just didn't have anything I felt was valuable. But now i have.

At first I also had thr reaction of thinking "he asked for it" , and all that schadenfreude feeling.

However, now I think it was a great loss and hope the killer gets the whole extent of the law.

See, in a society that is tending more and more to the extremes, polarization and radicalism, we NEED people to TALK.

Being from outside of the US, I don't know the ideas this guy was spewing; However, from what I've read, what he did was basically talking and debate. We need that. We need to be open to talk ideas, even if we dont agree. Where are we when someone who speaks his mind gets killed for that?

I am socialist and anti-US-imperialism in general, but I tend to frequent r/conservative and r/ccw and even patriots.win subteddits. Because im interested in a different point of view.

I get sad that most posts in r/conservative block externals, as I would love to interact in some of the posts. But... after this guys assassination... I dont blame them. People should feel safe to talk and discuss their ideas.

I'm to stupid to be able to debate against this guy, or the other guy.that speaks too fast and always looks angry (anti abortion American dude). But ... why isn't someone smarter and with opposing views debating them?. We need it.

◧◩◪
3. BolexN+YA6[view] [source] 2025-09-12 22:35:45
>>xtract+KY5
I don’t disagree with your point overall but the sad reality is that Charlie Kirk was not there to have a discussion. He went around trolling people and provoking big responses at universities so he could farm it out on social media. A huge part of his income was being a troll.

That does not mean he deserved to die. He didn’t. But he did not die undergoing some noble endeavor or engaging in free speech in some profoundly brave way.

[go to top]