zlacker

[return to "Charlie Kirk killed at event in Utah"]
1. tmsh+s41[view] [source] 2025-09-11 00:53:22
>>david9+(OP)
Looking at recent events through a historical lens: the 1960s saw the assassinations of MLK, RFK, JFK, and Malcolm X during a wave of progressive change. Today’s assassination attempts and targeted violence seem to follow a similar pattern during periods of significant social and political shifts.

As RFK said after MLK’s death, we must choose between “violence and non-violence, between lawlessness and love.” His call for unity and rejecting hatred feels as urgent now as it was then.

Violence is never the answer. But understanding these tragic patterns might help us navigate our current moment with hopefully more empathy.

◧◩
2. pm90+Q51[view] [source] 2025-09-11 01:02:55
>>tmsh+s41
This is dangerous false equivalency. Charlie Kirk was not advocating for the rights of the downtrodden. He was a right wing provocateur, and he’s on the record saying that “some gun deaths are ok” in service of the 2nd amendment, and in making light of the nearly deadly political attack on the Pelosi family.

Political violence, especially deadly violence is not ok. But comparing Charlie Kirk to MLK is also not ok.

◧◩◪
3. typeof+k32[view] [source] 2025-09-11 10:57:48
>>pm90+Q51
He was advocating for the rights of the living yet unborn. He was advocating for the downtrodden youth who are being unnecessarily overburdened with massive college debt and unable to afford a home. He was advocating for citizens who are being put last by their electorate.
◧◩◪◨
4. thranc+jt3[view] [source] 2025-09-11 20:01:57
>>typeof+k32
He was helping the "unborn" by advocating for stripping womens of their rights and sending them back to the house.

He was helping students by supporting the most anti-intellectual party ever, that cancelled student debt relief and help programs.

He was helping the downtrodden by supporting the most billionaire-friendly administration ever, giving tax breaks to the rich and dismantling the last of our social safety nets.

Get real. I don't even buy that you believe all that shit.

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. tirant+gJ4[view] [source] 2025-09-12 09:33:23
>>thranc+jt3
A small but important correction. The debt was never cancelled, but socialized and payed by all the American citizens. A loan that was taken voluntarily by adults was arbitrarily reassigned and forced upon the rest of the American citizens, including all those who never had accepted to take such debt.

Completely violating the principles of personal responsibility.

It is very easy to be generous and altruist with someone else's money and then even take the credit for it.

[go to top]