zlacker

[return to "Charlie Kirk killed at event in Utah"]
1. loughn+Bg1[view] [source] 2025-09-11 02:37:24
>>david9+(OP)
The sad irony is that he's at a college campus debating/arguing with people. At their best that's what college campuses are for. I know they haven't been living up to it lately but seeing him gunned down feels like a metaphor.

I know he liked to publicize the exchanges where he got the best of someone, and bury the others, and that he was a far, far cry from a public intellectual. Still, he talked to folks about ideas, and that's something that we should have more of.

That should be something that we strive for, but I fear we'll see it less and less. Who'se going to want to go around and argue with people now?

◧◩
2. passwo+OQ1[view] [source] 2025-09-11 08:47:32
>>loughn+Bg1
It is a performance that appears as a debate.
◧◩◪
3. raxxor+XQ1[view] [source] 2025-09-11 08:50:53
>>passwo+OQ1
Is that relevant? Could be said about any public debate or speaker.
◧◩◪◨
4. passwo+AS1[view] [source] 2025-09-11 09:09:44
>>raxxor+XQ1
Of course it couldn't. Go and compare these two. You may as well compare fruit loops to wagyu beef.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xyAqMIZdX5g ("Charlie Kirk Hands Out L's")

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xpVQ3l5P0A4 ("Chomsky-Foucault Debate on Power vs Justice")

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. tirant+1G4[view] [source] 2025-09-12 09:03:18
>>passwo+AS1
Are you expecting that all debates reach the level of a Chomsky-Foucault debate and to discard anyone below it?

Are you even able to meet that level yourself? This is non-sense. Obviously we all would love to reach that level of knowledge, introspection and speaking capability of Chomsky/Foucault, but it is absurd to expect it at all times.

[go to top]