zlacker

[return to "Charlie Kirk killed at event in Utah"]
1. OGEnth+zd[view] [source] 2025-09-10 20:19:20
>>david9+(OP)
If that video is real, the shooter had incredibly accurate aim.
◧◩
2. tracke+2j[view] [source] 2025-09-10 20:42:42
>>OGEnth+zd
Given the distance, unless well trained it was probably luck more than anything.
◧◩◪
3. int_19+2w[view] [source] 2025-09-10 21:37:02
>>tracke+2j
Modern firearms don't really require that much training to hit a static man sized target at 200m from a supported position. This is well within the "point blank" range, meaning that vertical deviation of the bullet is too small to bother adjusting for, and wind effects on rifle (i.e. very fast moving) bullets at this range are also fairly limited. So long as the rifle is zeroed, lining up the scope with the target and pulling the trigger without jerking it is basically all it takes, and those kinds of skills can be acquired in a few trips to the range.
◧◩◪◨
4. samiri+mC[view] [source] 2025-09-10 22:01:18
>>int_19+2w
Can you do this? Like, I’ve killed every animal I’ve shot at so far (legally, while hunting) and I know I couldn’t make that shot. The nerves alone Jesus. I’m always surprised and dubious when I hear this claim repeated. A blood vessel in a human from 200 yards. After a few trips to the range. Really.
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. trench+2x1[view] [source] 2025-09-11 05:24:51
>>samiri+mC
I'm not a particularly skilled shooter (don't get to practice as much as I'd like.) And I can hit a target at 300m using a $500 AR-15 and a $300 optic. It's not that hard at the range.
[go to top]