zlacker

[return to "Charlie Kirk killed at event in Utah"]
1. andrew+Hr[view] [source] 2025-09-10 21:20:39
>>david9+(OP)
It's been a few hours since the shooting and no suspect is in custody.

I wonder if he/she/they will ever be caught?

◧◩
2. pjc50+at[view] [source] 2025-09-10 21:25:47
>>andrew+Hr
There's going to be a colossal manhunt. Every possible technology will be mobilized. And it's very hard not to slip up on opsec. Unless the guy leaves the country very quickly, I would expect him to be caught (or killed resisting arrest, the common fate of mass shootings).
◧◩◪
3. progra+Bv[view] [source] 2025-09-10 21:35:15
>>pjc50+at
Note: it was an assassination, not a mass shooting. There was only one shot.
◧◩◪◨
4. jimt12+LF[view] [source] 2025-09-10 22:18:23
>>progra+Bv
Pedantic, but...why is this an assassination and not just a murder? Because he was more than likely targeted? Tupac was targeted (for some street-level bullshit), but I don't think anyone would call his demise an "assassination".
◧◩◪◨⬒
5. OkayPh+kS[view] [source] 2025-09-10 23:26:56
>>jimt12+LF
Assassinations are surprise killings of prominent individuals for political purposes. Targeted gang killings are an interesting case, because they are political within the context of intra- and inter-gang politics, but not viewed in that light in a broader context. If I was watching a documentary about two rival gangs, I probably wouldn't blink twice at someone referring to a hit on a rival leader as an assassination. In every day conversation, it would probably be weird, because the normal assumption is of the broader political sphere.

People are calling this an assassination because they are making the (probably reasonable) guess that the reason to shoot Charlie Kirk during a political speech is to make a political statement.

[go to top]