zlacker

>>whoish+(OP)
I've applied half dozen times to positions in Mumbai, India but haven't heard back once

>>quaint+Pi
We agree that companies should reply to applicants, but please don't break the rules at the top of Who Is Hiring threads.

We detached this comment from >>45093824 .

>>dang+Zl
p.s. Here's a bunch of past mod explanations about this, if anyone wants to understand why we have this rule:

>>44772030 (Aug 2025)

>>44770591 (Aug 2025)

>>44161363 (June 2025)

>>40239393 (May 2024)

>>39222099 (Feb 2024)

>>37759361 (Oct 2023)

>>37759152 (Oct 2023)

>>37741801 (Oct 2023)

>>37397355 (Sept 2023)

>>37354391 (Sept 2023)

>>36158274 (June 2023)

>>35818403 (May 2023)

>>32335600 (Aug 2022)

>>29408468 (Dec 2021)

>>28385149 (Sept 2021)

>>24984132 (Nov 2020)

>>22667632 (March 2020)

>>22244528 (Feb 2020)

>>16987471 (May 2018)

>>9822899 (July 2015)

>>dang+Sm
How are companies allowed to post the same posting for the same roles month after month? If they are not able to find great candidate fits in this environment, and their employee counts are not moving on LinkedIn / crunchbase etc for months, can they get blacklisted from using this? I have seen several of these companies post again today

>>Bighea+1o4
We're not in a position to police that. We don't have the resources.

Even apart from that, I'm not sure how one could distinguish legit from non-legit cases, short of raiding company offices.

>>dang+uu4
What about blacklisting companies that post the same links from their ATS platforms for months at a time? It may be difficult to track from an admin perspective but as an applicant that has been browsing this for a few months, a lot of these are easy to filter out

I can show examples from this current / latest monthly postings