zlacker

[return to "Ask HN: Who is hiring? (September 2025)"]
1. quaint+Pi[view] [source] 2025-09-01 16:51:35
>>whoish+(OP)
I've applied half dozen times to positions in Mumbai, India but haven't heard back once
◧◩
2. dang+Zl[view] [source] 2025-09-01 17:11:50
>>quaint+Pi
We agree that companies should reply to applicants, but please don't break the rules at the top of Who Is Hiring threads.

We detached this comment from >>45093824 .

◧◩◪
3. dang+Sm[view] [source] 2025-09-01 17:16:57
>>dang+Zl
p.s. Here's a bunch of past mod explanations about this, if anyone wants to understand why we have this rule:

>>44772030 (Aug 2025)

>>44770591 (Aug 2025)

>>44161363 (June 2025)

>>40239393 (May 2024)

>>39222099 (Feb 2024)

>>37759361 (Oct 2023)

>>37759152 (Oct 2023)

>>37741801 (Oct 2023)

>>37397355 (Sept 2023)

>>37354391 (Sept 2023)

>>36158274 (June 2023)

>>35818403 (May 2023)

>>32335600 (Aug 2022)

>>29408468 (Dec 2021)

>>28385149 (Sept 2021)

>>24984132 (Nov 2020)

>>22667632 (March 2020)

>>22244528 (Feb 2020)

>>16987471 (May 2018)

>>9822899 (July 2015)

◧◩◪◨
4. mixmas+B81[view] [source] 2025-09-01 23:34:41
>>dang+Sm
> "rules for job seekers, Carte blanche for companies"

Sums it up nicely.

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. dang+Lr1[view] [source] 2025-09-02 03:08:42
>>mixmas+B81
When I look at the top text, I see at least 2 rules that apply to companies.

Edit: Btw, please don't use quotation marks to make it look like you're quoting someone when you aren't: https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que...

Edit 2: sorry, I was totally wrong about that! see >>45106871

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. mixmas+eW2[view] [source] 2025-09-02 15:37:20
>>dang+Lr1
Huh? I cut and pasted from your first link above.

Also you removed/downvoted my request that asked posters to identify regions they are hiring from, specifically one about Stockholm. I’m curious what motivates such actions.

◧◩◪◨⬒⬓⬔
7. dang+Dy3[view] [source] 2025-09-02 18:09:30
>>mixmas+eW2
Oh sorry, I totally missed that! Your use of quotation marks was just fine. I thought you were being snarky (as people sometimes do) and apologize for making the wrong assumption.

> Also you removed/downvoted my request that asked posters to identify regions they are hiring from

Do you mean >>45095800 ? I didn't remove or downvote it. I did detach it from >>45095292 because it seemed to be a general comment that belonged at the top level, rather than a response to a particular job ad.

[go to top]