zlacker

[return to "Researchers find evidence of ChatGPT buzzwords turning up in everyday speech"]
1. milanc+p6[view] [source] 2025-08-27 22:03:55
>>giulio+(OP)
"Recent large-scale upticks in the use of words like “delve” and “intricate” in certain fields, especially education and academic writing, are attributed to the widespread introduction of LLMs with a chat function, like ChatGPT, that overuses those buzzwords."

OK, but please don't do what pg did a year or so ago and dismiss anyone who wrote "delve" as AI writing. I've been using "delve" in speech for 15+ years. It's just a question where and how one learns their English.

◧◩
2. diego_+m8[view] [source] 2025-08-27 22:16:18
>>milanc+p6
Same thing as with em dashes. Some of us have been using em dashes from before ChatGPT.
◧◩◪
3. Fade_D+lc[view] [source] 2025-08-27 22:46:51
>>diego_+m8
Unfortunately the em dash has already been relegated to the dungeon of AI suspicion for the next 5-10 years.
◧◩◪◨
4. viccis+JB[view] [source] 2025-08-28 02:56:25
>>Fade_D+lc
Good. It's a crutch for poorly composed sentences or for prose intending to imitate the affect of poorly composed sentences. There's not a single sentence under the sun that needs an emdash. Commas and parentheses can do it all, and an excess of either is a sign of poorly edited prose.

I don't buy the pro-clanker pro-em dash movement that has come out of nowhere in the past several years.

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. johnni+lY[view] [source] 2025-08-28 06:55:57
>>viccis+JB
Misused affect/effect there bub
◧◩◪◨⬒⬓
6. viccis+OT3[view] [source] 2025-08-29 05:18:58
>>johnni+lY
No "bub" I used it correctly. Review your effect/affect noun distinctions and try again. Google "affect theory" if that makes it easier.
[go to top]