zlacker

[return to "Google will allow only apps from verified developers to be installed on Android"]
1. 876368+tk[view] [source] 2025-08-25 20:01:04
>>kotaKa+(OP)
Official announcement: https://android-developers.googleblog.com/2025/08/elevating-...

More info:

https://developer.android.com/developer-verification

https://support.google.com/googleplay/android-developer/answ...

Personally...we all know the Play Store is chock full of malicious garbage, so the verification requirements there don't do jack to protect users. The way I see it, this is nothing but a power grab, a way for Google to kill apps like Revanced for good. They'll just find some bullshit reason to suspend your developer account if you do something they don't like.

Every time I hear mentions of "safety" from the folks at Google, I'm reminded that there's a hidden Internet permission on Android that can neuter 95% of malicious apps. But it's hidden, apparently because keeping users from using it to block ads on apps is of greater concern to Google than keeping people safe.

> we will be confirming who the developer is, not reviewing the content of their app or where it came from

This is such an odd statement. I mean, surely they have to be willing to review the contents of apps at some point (if only to suspend the accounts of developers who are actually producing malware), or else this whole affair does nothing but introduce friction.

TFA had me believing that bypassing the restriction might've been possible by disabling Play Protect, but that doesn't seem to be the case since there aren't any mentions of it in the official info we've been given.

On the flip side, that's one less platform I care about supporting with my projects. We're down to just Linux and Windows if you're not willing to sell your soul (no, I will not be making a Google account) just for the right to develop for a certain platform.

◧◩
2. nolist+mw1[view] [source] 2025-08-26 06:16:09
>>876368+tk
Doesn't Windows have the same thing aka Code Signing?

https://www.electronforge.io/guides/code-signing/code-signin...

◧◩◪
3. tsimio+Ex1[view] [source] 2025-08-26 06:27:23
>>nolist+mw1
You can install unsigned apps on Windows just fine, maybe with one extra nag screen. Plenty of large open source projects don't sign their installers - VLC being one big example that many normal people use.
◧◩◪◨
4. Voulta+JY2[view] [source] 2025-08-26 16:08:33
>>tsimio+Ex1
IIRC Windows is testing to turn that nag screen into a "no you don't". Which is such BS given all the evidence we have that malware vendors and bad actors have and continue to get their malware signed by MS because they simply can't reliably detect it.
[go to top]