zlacker

[return to "Google will allow only apps from verified developers to be installed on Android"]
1. wvenab+0I[view] [source] 2025-08-25 22:14:28
>>kotaKa+(OP)
I predict Windows will end up going this route before Google backtracks on it.

This is the future; partially fuelled by malware, partially fuelled by the desire for platform control, and partially fuelled by government regulation.

◧◩
2. bloomc+xJ[view] [source] 2025-08-25 22:22:46
>>wvenab+0I
Microsoft has way too much of legacy software people use, banning it all overnight will not go well at all. They understand that as well.

They tried to pull a similar move with WinRT/UWP, but nobody wanted it, so now you can continue with Win32.

They would love to do so, but legacy compatibility is a major business advantage.

◧◩◪
3. wvenab+BL[view] [source] 2025-08-25 22:35:35
>>bloomc+xJ
Microsoft mismanaged it but there was a potential parallel universe where they were successful at that plan and consumer versions of Windows would be locked to the Microsoft store.

They did a bunch of terrible inept rollouts with confusing technology for both users and developers and effectively shot themselves in the foot. But it did not have to go down that way.

◧◩◪◨
4. george+uZ[view] [source] 2025-08-26 00:27:20
>>wvenab+BL
> there was a potential parallel universe where they were successful at that plan and consumer versions of Windows would be locked to the Microsoft store.

Sounds like a nightmare universe.

I've got a hobby app in kotlin multiplatform with iOS/Android/Windows/WASM builds and while I have no issues with Apple's App Store or Google Play, I've had nothing but problems trying to support Windows Store.

The MSIX installer format is horrendous to deal with and the certification process for new releases on Windows Store is always far too long and in the cases they do find issues the reports of the issue that they log are entirely worthless.

I ended up just pulling the app off the Windows Store entirely and making it a downloadable *.msi installer. While the extra layer of presumed integrity of the app being on the Microsoft Store would be nice it wasn't remotely worth the effort for the tiny amount of people who were using the Windows version in the first place, especially given the app is free.

◧◩◪◨⬒
5. wvenab+231[view] [source] 2025-08-26 01:00:04
>>george+uZ
That's funny because I don't presume anything on the Windows store has integrity and feel safer downloading the MSI from the official source.
[go to top]